Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
INA §242(b)(6) requires consolidation when judicial review is sought from both the final order and a later reopening or reconsideration decision.
Consolidation does not eliminate separate filing obligations for separately reviewable orders. Stone explains the separate-finality framework. Once both petitions exist, the court can consolidate them procedurally.
Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
INA §242(b)(6) requires consolidation when judicial review is sought from both the final order and a later reopening or reconsideration decision.
The statutory consolidation starts with the operative agency order; the statutory consolidation then fixes finality, venue, exhaustion, and the review provision.
A complete statutory consolidation file separates agency motions; the statutory consolidation also separates stay litigation, record questions, and merits briefing.
Threshold Rule: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Consolidation does not eliminate separate filing obligations for separately reviewable orders. For statutory consolidation, threshold rule point 1 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, threshold rule point 2 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates threshold rule point 3; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents threshold rule point 4; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue.
With statutory consolidation, counsel tests threshold rule point 5; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports threshold rule point 6; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve threshold rule point 7; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain threshold rule point 8; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, threshold rule point 9 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard.
Under statutory consolidation, threshold rule point 10 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates threshold rule point 11; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents threshold rule point 12; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests threshold rule point 13; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports threshold rule point 14; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence.
Finality and Posture: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Stone explains the separate-finality framework. Under statutory consolidation, finality and posture point 1 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates finality and posture point 2; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents finality and posture point 3; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests finality and posture point 4; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion.
The statutory consolidation record supports finality and posture point 5; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve finality and posture point 6; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain finality and posture point 7; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, finality and posture point 8 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, finality and posture point 9 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy.
The statutory consolidation analysis separates finality and posture point 10; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents finality and posture point 11; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests finality and posture point 12; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports finality and posture point 13; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve finality and posture point 14; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions.
Jurisdiction and Channeling: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Once both petitions exist, the court can consolidate them procedurally. The statutory consolidation analysis separates jurisdiction and channeling point 1; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents jurisdiction and channeling point 2; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests jurisdiction and channeling point 3; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports jurisdiction and channeling point 4; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence.
Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve jurisdiction and channeling point 5; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain jurisdiction and channeling point 6; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, jurisdiction and channeling point 7 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, jurisdiction and channeling point 8 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates jurisdiction and channeling point 9; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact.
A statutory consolidation filing documents jurisdiction and channeling point 10; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests jurisdiction and channeling point 11; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports jurisdiction and channeling point 12; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve jurisdiction and channeling point 13; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain jurisdiction and channeling point 14; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested.
Exhaustion and Preservation: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Briefing should distinguish original-order issues from reopening issues. A statutory consolidation filing documents exhaustion and preservation point 1; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests exhaustion and preservation point 2; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports exhaustion and preservation point 3; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve exhaustion and preservation point 4; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions.
For federal statutory consolidation, explain exhaustion and preservation point 5; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, exhaustion and preservation point 6 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, exhaustion and preservation point 7 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates exhaustion and preservation point 8; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents exhaustion and preservation point 9; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue.
With statutory consolidation, counsel tests exhaustion and preservation point 10; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports exhaustion and preservation point 11; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve exhaustion and preservation point 12; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain exhaustion and preservation point 13; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, exhaustion and preservation point 14 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard.
Administrative Record: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
A consolidated case can still contain different standards of review for different claims. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests administrative record point 1; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports administrative record point 2; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve administrative record point 3; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain administrative record point 4; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested.
For statutory consolidation, administrative record point 5 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, administrative record point 6 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates administrative record point 7; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents administrative record point 8; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests administrative record point 9; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion.
The statutory consolidation record supports administrative record point 10; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve administrative record point 11; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain administrative record point 12; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, administrative record point 13 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, administrative record point 14 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy.
Standard of Review: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Consolidation does not eliminate separate filing obligations for separately reviewable orders. The statutory consolidation record supports standard of review point 1; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve standard of review point 2; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain standard of review point 3; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, standard of review point 4 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard.
Under statutory consolidation, standard of review point 5 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates standard of review point 6; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents standard of review point 7; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests standard of review point 8; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports standard of review point 9; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence.
Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve standard of review point 10; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain standard of review point 11; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, standard of review point 12 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, standard of review point 13 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates standard of review point 14; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact.
Review Bars: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Stone explains the separate-finality framework. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve review bars point 1; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain review bars point 2; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, review bars point 3 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, review bars point 4 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy.
The statutory consolidation analysis separates review bars point 5; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents review bars point 6; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests review bars point 7; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports review bars point 8; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve review bars point 9; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions.
For federal statutory consolidation, explain review bars point 10; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, review bars point 11 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, review bars point 12 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates review bars point 13; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents review bars point 14; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue.
Legal Questions: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Once both petitions exist, the court can consolidate them procedurally. For federal statutory consolidation, explain legal questions point 1; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, legal questions point 2 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, legal questions point 3 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates legal questions point 4; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact.
A statutory consolidation filing documents legal questions point 5; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests legal questions point 6; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports legal questions point 7; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve legal questions point 8; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain legal questions point 9; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested.
For statutory consolidation, legal questions point 10 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, legal questions point 11 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates legal questions point 12; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents legal questions point 13; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests legal questions point 14; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion.
Factual Questions: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Briefing should distinguish original-order issues from reopening issues. For statutory consolidation, factual questions point 1 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, factual questions point 2 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates factual questions point 3; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents factual questions point 4; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue.
With statutory consolidation, counsel tests factual questions point 5; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports factual questions point 6; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve factual questions point 7; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain factual questions point 8; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, factual questions point 9 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard.
Under statutory consolidation, factual questions point 10 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates factual questions point 11; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents factual questions point 12; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests factual questions point 13; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports factual questions point 14; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence.
Available Remedy: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
A consolidated case can still contain different standards of review for different claims. Under statutory consolidation, available remedy point 1 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates available remedy point 2; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents available remedy point 3; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests available remedy point 4; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion.
The statutory consolidation record supports available remedy point 5; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve available remedy point 6; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain available remedy point 7; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, available remedy point 8 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, available remedy point 9 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy.
The statutory consolidation analysis separates available remedy point 10; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents available remedy point 11; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests available remedy point 12; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports available remedy point 13; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve available remedy point 14; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions.
Filing Strategy: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Consolidation does not eliminate separate filing obligations for separately reviewable orders. The statutory consolidation analysis separates filing strategy point 1; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents filing strategy point 2; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests filing strategy point 3; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports filing strategy point 4; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence.
Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve filing strategy point 5; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain filing strategy point 6; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, filing strategy point 7 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, filing strategy point 8 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates filing strategy point 9; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact.
A statutory consolidation filing documents filing strategy point 10; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests filing strategy point 11; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports filing strategy point 12; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve filing strategy point 13; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain filing strategy point 14; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested.
Briefing Strategy: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Stone explains the separate-finality framework. A statutory consolidation filing documents briefing strategy point 1; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests briefing strategy point 2; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports briefing strategy point 3; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve briefing strategy point 4; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions.
For federal statutory consolidation, explain briefing strategy point 5; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, briefing strategy point 6 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, briefing strategy point 7 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates briefing strategy point 8; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents briefing strategy point 9; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue.
With statutory consolidation, counsel tests briefing strategy point 10; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports briefing strategy point 11; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve briefing strategy point 12; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain briefing strategy point 13; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, briefing strategy point 14 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard.
Stay and Enforcement: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Once both petitions exist, the court can consolidate them procedurally. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests stay and enforcement point 1; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports stay and enforcement point 2; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve stay and enforcement point 3; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain stay and enforcement point 4; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested.
For statutory consolidation, stay and enforcement point 5 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, stay and enforcement point 6 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates stay and enforcement point 7; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents stay and enforcement point 8; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests stay and enforcement point 9; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion.
The statutory consolidation record supports stay and enforcement point 10; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve stay and enforcement point 11; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain stay and enforcement point 12; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, stay and enforcement point 13 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, stay and enforcement point 14 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy.
Common Errors: Consolidating Review of a Final Order and a Motion-to-Reopen Decision
Briefing should distinguish original-order issues from reopening issues. The statutory consolidation record supports common errors point 1; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence. Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve common errors point 2; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain common errors point 3; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, common errors point 4 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard.
Under statutory consolidation, common errors point 5 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates common errors point 6; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact. A statutory consolidation filing documents common errors point 7; statutory consolidation calendars deadlines; statutory consolidation confirms venue. With statutory consolidation, counsel tests common errors point 8; statutory consolidation checks reviewability; statutory consolidation addresses exhaustion. The statutory consolidation record supports common errors point 9; statutory consolidation uses pinpoint cites; statutory consolidation avoids new evidence.
Before briefing statutory consolidation, resolve common errors point 10; statutory consolidation identifies review bars; statutory consolidation invokes exceptions. For federal statutory consolidation, explain common errors point 11; statutory consolidation preserves the issue; statutory consolidation states relief requested. For statutory consolidation, common errors point 12 matters; statutory consolidation identifies the order; statutory consolidation states the standard. Under statutory consolidation, common errors point 13 must be preserved; statutory consolidation cites the record; statutory consolidation requests the remedy. The statutory consolidation analysis separates common errors point 14; statutory consolidation distinguishes law; statutory consolidation distinguishes fact.
Primary Legal Authorities and Sources
- 8 U.S.C. §1252 — Judicial Review of Orders of Removal Current judicial-review statute.
- Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386 (1995) Motions to reopen/reconsider do not automatically suspend finality for judicial review.
- Mata v. Lynch, 576 U.S. 143 (2015) Courts of appeals may review BIA denials of statutory motions to reopen.
- Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010) Judicial review of reopening decisions preserved where discretion arises by regulation.
- Riley v. Bondi, 606 U.S. ___ (2025) Finality and nonjurisdictional 30-day rule.
- Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 598 U.S. 411 (2023) Exhaustion is a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main rule for 1252(b)(6) consolidate petition review motion reopen?
Which court handles 1252(b)(6) consolidate petition review motion reopen?
Can new evidence be added in a 1252(b)(6) consolidate petition review motion reopen case?
Does filing automatically stay removal in a 1252(b)(6) consolidate petition review motion reopen case?
How does exhaustion affect 1252(b)(6) consolidate petition review motion reopen?
How should 1252(b)(6) consolidate petition review motion reopen be preserved for review?
Related INA237.com Guides
Need Help With a Removal Case?
If you have an NTA, immigration court notice, USCIS denial, ICE document, or criminal record relevant to possible removability, keep a complete copy available for review.
Request a Consultation