Matter of Forjoe: INA §237(a)(1)(H) Does Not Waive Fraud at Adjustment of Status
Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. This page addresses the removal-case proof, defenses, and waiver consequences that follow from that rule.
Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H).
Core Rule
The Forjoe-question-core-rule point begins. Under Forjoe-question-core-rule, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. For Forjoe-question-core-rule, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-core-rule, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-core-rule, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-core-rule, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-core-rule analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-core-rule, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. In Forjoe-question-core-rule, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-core-rule, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-core-rule, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-core-rule record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-core-rule, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). For Forjoe-question-core-rule, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-core-rule, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-core-rule, preserve the objection and ruling.
Controlling Authority
The Forjoe-question-controlling-authority point begins. Under Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. For Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-controlling-authority analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). In Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-controlling-authority record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. For Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-controlling-authority, preserve the objection and ruling.
Government Theory
The Forjoe-question-government-theory point begins. Under Forjoe-question-government-theory, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). For Forjoe-question-government-theory, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-government-theory, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-government-theory, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-government-theory, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-government-theory analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-government-theory, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. In Forjoe-question-government-theory, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-government-theory, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-government-theory, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-government-theory record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-government-theory, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. For Forjoe-question-government-theory, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-government-theory, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-government-theory, preserve the objection and ruling.
Historical Timeline
The Forjoe-question-historical-timeline point begins. Under Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. For Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-historical-timeline analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. In Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-historical-timeline record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. For Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-historical-timeline, preserve the objection and ruling.
Primary Documents
The Forjoe-question-primary-documents point begins. Under Forjoe-question-primary-documents, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. For Forjoe-question-primary-documents, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-primary-documents, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-primary-documents, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-primary-documents, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-primary-documents analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-primary-documents, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. In Forjoe-question-primary-documents, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-primary-documents, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-primary-documents, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-primary-documents record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-primary-documents, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. For Forjoe-question-primary-documents, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-primary-documents, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-primary-documents, preserve the objection and ruling.
Burden and Standard
The Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard point begins. Under Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. For Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. In Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). For Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-burden-and-standard, preserve the objection and ruling.
Materiality or Causation
The Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation point begins. Under Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. For Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). In Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. For Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-materiality-or-causation, preserve the objection and ruling.
Statements and Admissions
The Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions point begins. Under Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). For Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. In Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. For Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-statements-and-admissions, preserve the objection and ruling.
Government Proof
The Forjoe-question-government-proof point begins. Under Forjoe-question-government-proof, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. For Forjoe-question-government-proof, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-government-proof, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-government-proof, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-government-proof, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-government-proof analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-government-proof, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. In Forjoe-question-government-proof, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-government-proof, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-government-proof, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-government-proof record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-government-proof, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. For Forjoe-question-government-proof, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-government-proof, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-government-proof, preserve the objection and ruling.
Respondent Proof
The Forjoe-question-respondent-proof point begins. Under Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. For Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-respondent-proof analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. In Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-respondent-proof record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. For Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-respondent-proof, preserve the objection and ruling.
Waiver or Defense
The Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense point begins. Under Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. For Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. In Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). For Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-waiver-or-defense, preserve the objection and ruling.
Independent Charges
The Forjoe-question-independent-charges point begins. Under Forjoe-question-independent-charges, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. For Forjoe-question-independent-charges, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-independent-charges, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-independent-charges, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-independent-charges, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-independent-charges analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-independent-charges, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). In Forjoe-question-independent-charges, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-independent-charges, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-independent-charges, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-independent-charges record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-independent-charges, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. For Forjoe-question-independent-charges, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-independent-charges, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-independent-charges, preserve the objection and ruling.
Merits Hearing
The Forjoe-question-merits-hearing point begins. Under Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, Fraud committed during adjustment inside the United States is not waived merely through §237(a)(1)(H). For Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-merits-hearing analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. In Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-merits-hearing record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. For Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-merits-hearing, preserve the objection and ruling.
Appeal Preservation
The Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation point begins. Under Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, The distinction can determine a §237(a)(1)(A) case based on fraud at adjustment. For Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. In Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. For Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-appeal-preservation, preserve the objection and ruling.
Practice Checklist
The Forjoe-question-practice-checklist point begins. Under Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, Counsel should identify whether alleged fraud occurred at entry, adjustment, or both. For Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, identify the controlling document. In Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, date the relevant event. When presenting Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, tie proof to the disputed element. For review of Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, obtain a specific ruling.
The Forjoe-question-practice-checklist analysis stands separately. For Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, Matter of Forjoe holds that 'at the time of admission' in INA §237(a)(1)(H) refers to lawful entry after inspection and authorization. In Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, state who bears the burden. When defending Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, answer the exact government theory. For Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, preserve the legal standard and the requested remedy.
The Forjoe-question-practice-checklist record should use primary evidence. In Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, Forjoe overruled Matter of Agour's contrary adjustment-as-admission rule for this waiver. For Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, compare signed forms with agency records. When facts conflict in Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, reconcile them with documents. For appeal of Forjoe-question-practice-checklist, preserve the objection and ruling.
Primary Legal Authorities and Sources
- Matter of Forjoe, 29 I&N Dec. 463 (BIA 2026) Current BIA precedent limiting INA §237(a)(1)(H) to fraud or misrepresentation at admission and overruling Matter of Agour.
- 8 U.S.C. §1227 — Deportable Aliens Current deportability statute.
- 8 U.S.C. §1182 — Inadmissible Aliens Current inadmissibility statute.
- Matter of Fu, 23 I&N Dec. 985 (BIA 2006) BIA precedent on direct-result document inadmissibility within INA §237(a)(1)(H).
- Matter of Tima, 26 I&N Dec. 839 (BIA 2016) BIA precedent holding that §237(a)(1)(H) does not waive a separate CIMT deportability charge.
- 8 C.F.R. §1240.8 — Burdens of Proof Current removal burden regulation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the central rule for Matter of Forjoe 237(a)(1)(H) adjustment fraud waiver?
Who has the burden in a Matter of Forjoe 237(a)(1)(H) adjustment fraud waiver case?
What evidence matters most for Matter of Forjoe 237(a)(1)(H) adjustment fraud waiver?
Can INA §237(a)(1)(H) resolve Matter of Forjoe 237(a)(1)(H) adjustment fraud waiver?
Can one waiver eliminate every charge related to Matter of Forjoe 237(a)(1)(H) adjustment fraud waiver?
How should Matter of Forjoe 237(a)(1)(H) adjustment fraud waiver be preserved for appeal?
Related INA237.com Guides
Need Help With a Removal Case?
If you have an NTA, immigration court notice, USCIS denial, ICE document, or criminal record relevant to possible removability, keep a complete copy available for review.
Request a Consultation