Asylum Statutory Bars, Firm Resettlement, Frivolousness, and Security Restrictions

Firm Resettlement and Facially Valid Residence Permits Under Matter of D-X- & Y-Z-

Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. This page focuses on the governing bar, burden, evidence, and remaining protection options.

Reviewed by Peter Messersmith September 18, 2026

Direct Answer

Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement.

Core Rule

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework core rule applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for core rule.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework core rule applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for core rule.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework core rule applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for core rule. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for core rule.

Statutory Text

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework statutory text applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for statutory text.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework statutory text applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for statutory text.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework statutory text applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for statutory text. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for statutory text.

Precedent

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework precedent applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for precedent.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework precedent applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for precedent.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework precedent applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for precedent. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for precedent.

Trigger

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework trigger applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for trigger.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework trigger applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for trigger.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework trigger applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for trigger. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for trigger.

Burden

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework burden applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for burden.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework burden applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for burden.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework burden applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for burden. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for burden.

Evidence

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework evidence applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for evidence.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework evidence applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for evidence.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework evidence applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for evidence. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for evidence.

Applicant Position

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework applicant position applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for applicant position.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework applicant position applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for applicant position.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework applicant position applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for applicant position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for applicant position.

DHS Position

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework dhs position applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for dhs position.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework dhs position applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for dhs position.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework dhs position applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for dhs position. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for dhs position.

Judge Findings

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework judge findings applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for judge findings.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework judge findings applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for judge findings.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework judge findings applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for judge findings. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for judge findings.

Asylum Effect

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework asylum effect applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for asylum effect.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework asylum effect applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for asylum effect.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework asylum effect applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for asylum effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for asylum effect.

Withholding Effect

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework withholding effect applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for withholding effect.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework withholding effect applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for withholding effect.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework withholding effect applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for withholding effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for withholding effect.

CAT Effect

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework cat effect applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for cat effect.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework cat effect applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for cat effect.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework cat effect applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for cat effect. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for cat effect.

Strategy

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework strategy applies this rule: The applicant may contest whether the permit reflected legally available permanent resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for strategy.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework strategy applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for strategy.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework strategy applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for strategy. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for strategy.

Appeal Preservation

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework appeal preservation applies this rule: The record should include issuance circumstances, duration, renewal terms, and relevant law. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for appeal preservation.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework appeal preservation applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for appeal preservation.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework appeal preservation applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for appeal preservation. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for appeal preservation.

Checklist

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework checklist applies this rule: Firm-resettlement analysis should remain separate from general credibility. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework separates credibility questions for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tracks event chronology for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states burden trigger for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses primary evidence for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework tests each element for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework addresses any exception for checklist.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework checklist applies this rule: Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework distinguishes relief forms for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies CAT consequences for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework requests explicit findings for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework preserves burden objections for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework connects precedent to facts for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework avoids conclusory labels for checklist.

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework checklist applies this rule: The permit may retain evidentiary significance even when the applicant says it was fraudulently obtained. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework states requested disposition for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework organizes exhibits by element for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework records party concessions for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework protects appellate review for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework starts with controlling text for checklist. D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework identifies disputed conduct for checklist.

Primary Legal Authorities and Sources

Matter of D-X- & Y-Z-, 25 I&N Dec. 664 (BIA 2012) Residence-permit and onward-travel precedent.
Matter of A-G-G-, 25 I&N Dec. 486 (BIA 2011) Firm-resettlement burden framework.
8 C.F.R. §1208.15 — Firm Resettlement Current firm-resettlement regulation.
8 U.S.C. §1158 — Asylum Current asylum statute and statutory bars.
8 C.F.R. §1208.13 — Establishing Asylum Eligibility Current asylum eligibility and mandatory-bar regulation.
8 C.F.R. §1240.8(d) — Burden on Relief Applicant Current mandatory-bar burden rule.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main rule for Matter of D-X Y-Z facially valid permit firm resettlement?

Matter of D-X- & Y-Z- holds that a facially valid residence permit can constitute prima facie evidence of an offer of firm resettlement.

Who has the burden in Matter of D-X Y-Z facially valid permit firm resettlement?

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework uses the overall relief burden and the mandatory-bar burden rule in 8 C.F.R. §1240.8(d) when the record indicates a bar may apply.

Does Matter of D-X Y-Z facially valid permit firm resettlement automatically bar CAT protection?

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework must be analyzed separately for asylum, withholding, CAT withholding, and CAT deferral.

What evidence matters for Matter of D-X Y-Z facially valid permit firm resettlement?

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework should be decided from evidence tied to the elements of the particular bar rather than general equities alone.

Can the Immigration Judge waive Matter of D-X Y-Z facially valid permit firm resettlement?

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework is governed by its statute and regulation; any exemption or waiver must come from applicable law.

How should Matter of D-X Y-Z facially valid permit firm resettlement be preserved for appeal?

D-X-Y-Z permit-evidence framework should produce findings on triggering evidence, burden, each disputed element, any exception, and the effect on each form of protection.

Case Evaluation

Need Help With a Removal Case?

If you have an NTA, immigration court notice, USCIS denial, ICE document, or criminal record relevant to possible removability, keep a complete copy available for review.

Request a Consultation