Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement
How INA §101(a)(43)(D) treats offenses described in 18 U.S.C. §§1956 or 1957 when the amount of funds exceeded $10,000.
Section 101(a)(43)(D) incorporates offenses described in 18 U.S.C. §§1956 and 1957 when the amount of funds exceeded $10,000. Matter of Dominguez Reyes applies the circumstance-specific approach to the $10,000 funds requirement. The qualifying federal offense component and the monetary threshold should be analyzed separately.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement
How INA §101(a)(43)(D) treats offenses described in 18 U.S.C. §§1956 or 1957 when the amount of funds exceeded $10,000.
money-laundering-AF analysis treats money laundering aggravated felony 10000 as a distinct §101(a)(43) category with its own elements, thresholds, and proof rules.
money-laundering-AF preparation should begin with the statute of conviction, certified record, sentence, and the exact aggravated-felony subparagraph charged by DHS.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 1
Section 101(a)(43)(D) incorporates offenses described in 18 U.S.C. §§1956 and 1957 when the amount of funds exceeded $10,000. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence.
money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. money-laundering-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis.
money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. money-laundering-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-1; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 2
Matter of Dominguez Reyes applies the circumstance-specific approach to the $10,000 funds requirement. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. money-laundering-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled.
money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph.
money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-2; money-laundering-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 3
The qualifying federal offense component and the monetary threshold should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code.
money-laundering-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof.
money-laundering-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-3; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 4
The record used to establish the amount must be tied to the offense of conviction. money-laundering-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records.
money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. money-laundering-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession.
money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-4; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 5
The amount-of-funds inquiry differs from the separate fraud-loss inquiry in §101(a)(43)(M)(i). money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement.
money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents.
money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. money-laundering-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-5; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 6
Section 101(a)(43)(D) incorporates offenses described in 18 U.S.C. §§1956 and 1957 when the amount of funds exceeded $10,000. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. money-laundering-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis.
money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. money-laundering-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged.
money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-6; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 7
Matter of Dominguez Reyes applies the circumstance-specific approach to the $10,000 funds requirement. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph.
money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated.
money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. money-laundering-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-7; money-laundering-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 8
The qualifying federal offense component and the monetary threshold should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof.
money-laundering-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph.
money-laundering-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-8; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 9
The record used to establish the amount must be tied to the offense of conviction. money-laundering-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession.
money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard.
money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-9; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives.
Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement: Issue 10
The amount-of-funds inquiry differs from the separate fraud-loss inquiry in §101(a)(43)(M)(i). money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents.
money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. money-laundering-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove.
money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. money-laundering-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-issue-10; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted.
Conviction Record Map: Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement
money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted.
money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove.
money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. money-laundering-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. money-laundering-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. money-laundering-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. money-laundering-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-11; money-laundering-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents.
Categorical Analysis Plan: Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement
money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph.
money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof.
money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. money-laundering-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. money-laundering-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. money-laundering-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. money-laundering-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-12; money-laundering-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code.
Removal and Relief Consequences: Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement
money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis.
money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence.
money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. money-laundering-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. money-laundering-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. money-laundering-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. money-laundering-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-13; money-laundering-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense.
Appeal Preservation: Money Laundering Aggravated Felony and the $10,000 Funds Requirement
money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives.
money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard.
money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. money-laundering-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. money-laundering-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. money-laundering-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. money-laundering-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-money-laundering-10000-practice-14; money-laundering-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession.
Primary Legal Authorities and Sources
- 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(43) — Aggravated Felony Definition Current House U.S. Code source for the aggravated-felony definition.
- Matter of Dominguez Reyes, 28 I&N Dec. 878 (BIA 2024) BIA precedent applying a circumstance-specific approach to the $10,000 amount in §101(a)(43)(D).
- 18 U.S.C. §§1956–1957 — Money Laundering Federal statutes incorporated by §101(a)(43)(D).
- 8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) — Aggravated-Felony Deportability Primary deportability statute for a person convicted of an aggravated felony after admission.
- EOIR BIA Precedent Chart — Aggravated Felonies Official EOIR topic chart collecting BIA aggravated-felony precedents.
- EOIR Precedent Decisions — Volume 26 Official EOIR source including Matter of Adeniye, Garza-Olivares, and Alvarado.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main rule for money laundering aggravated felony 10000?
Does every conviction labeled this way qualify as money laundering aggravated felony 10000?
Does sentence length matter for money laundering aggravated felony 10000?
What conviction records matter for money laundering aggravated felony 10000?
What immigration consequences follow from money laundering aggravated felony 10000?
How should money laundering aggravated felony 10000 be preserved for appeal?
Related INA237.com Guides
Need Help With a Removal Case?
If you have an NTA, immigration court notice, USCIS denial, ICE document, or criminal record relevant to possible removability, keep a complete copy available for review.
Request a Consultation