National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies
How INA §101(a)(43)(L) incorporates specified national-defense, classified-information, sabotage, treason, and intelligence-identity offenses.
Section 101(a)(43)(L) incorporates specific federal national-security offenses rather than a generic category of disloyal conduct. The offense of conviction should be matched to the exact incorporated federal provision. A national-security removal ground under INA §237(a)(4) is analytically distinct from aggravated-felony deportability.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies
How INA §101(a)(43)(L) incorporates specified national-defense, classified-information, sabotage, treason, and intelligence-identity offenses.
national-defense-AF analysis treats national defense treason aggravated felony immigration as a distinct §101(a)(43) category with its own elements, thresholds, and proof rules.
national-defense-AF preparation should begin with the statute of conviction, certified record, sentence, and the exact aggravated-felony subparagraph charged by DHS.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 1
Section 101(a)(43)(L) incorporates specific federal national-security offenses rather than a generic category of disloyal conduct. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. national-defense-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph.
national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated.
national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-1; national-defense-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 2
The offense of conviction should be matched to the exact incorporated federal provision. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof.
national-defense-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph.
national-defense-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-2; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 3
A national-security removal ground under INA §237(a)(4) is analytically distinct from aggravated-felony deportability. national-defense-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession.
national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. national-defense-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard.
national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-3; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 4
The clause itself does not impose a minimum sentence threshold. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents.
national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove.
national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. national-defense-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-4; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 5
The statutory cross-reference should be checked as of the conviction and current codification before charging or conceding removability. national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. national-defense-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged.
national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. national-defense-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense.
national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-5; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 6
Section 101(a)(43)(L) incorporates specific federal national-security offenses rather than a generic category of disloyal conduct. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated.
national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately.
national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. national-defense-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-6; national-defense-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 7
The offense of conviction should be matched to the exact incorporated federal provision. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph.
national-defense-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory.
national-defense-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-7; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 8
A national-security removal ground under INA §237(a)(4) is analytically distinct from aggravated-felony deportability. national-defense-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard.
national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives.
national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-8; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 9
The clause itself does not impose a minimum sentence threshold. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove.
national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. national-defense-AF record analysis should document aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF charging papers, plea documents, judgment, and sentencing records should be reconciled. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted.
national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. national-defense-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-9; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement.
National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies: Issue 10
The statutory cross-reference should be checked as of the conviction and current codification before charging or conceding removability. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. national-defense-AF closing argument should synthesize aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF the requested finding should be stated under the correct §101(a)(43) subparagraph. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense.
national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF motion practice should develop aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF overbreadth, indivisibility, sentence, and circumstance-specific arguments should be separated. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence.
national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF relief screening should follow aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF aggravated-felony consequences for cancellation, asylum, withholding, and waivers should be analyzed separately. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-issue-10; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis.
Conviction Record Map: National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies
national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement.
national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted.
national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove. national-defense-AF appellate preparation should preserve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF the record should permit legal review without reconstructing missing conviction documents. national-defense-AF sentence review should evaluate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF any imprisonment threshold must be treated as a separate statutory requirement. national-defense-AF chronology should isolate aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF offense date, conviction date, sentence, admission history, and removal charge should be charted. national-defense-AF hearing preparation should support aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-11; national-defense-AF certified conviction records should be paired with the specific legal proposition they prove.
Categorical Analysis Plan: National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies
national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory.
national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph.
national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof. national-defense-AF federal-comparator review should verify aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF statutory cross-references should be checked against the current and historically relevant code. national-defense-AF preservation should record aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF the respondent should obtain an explicit ruling on the aggravated-felony theory. national-defense-AF analysis should begin with aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF proof should identify the exact statute of conviction and the aggravated-felony subparagraph. national-defense-AF circumstance-specific review should consider aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-12; national-defense-AF nonelement facts should be used only when controlling law permits that mode of proof.
Removal and Relief Consequences: National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies
national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged.
national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis.
national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence. national-defense-AF categorical review should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF the minimum criminalized conduct should be compared with the generic or incorporated federal offense. national-defense-AF charging analysis should frame aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF DHS must connect the conviction to the precise aggravated-felony clause alleged. national-defense-AF state-law comparison should test aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF a state label alone should not substitute for element-by-element analysis. national-defense-AF decision drafting should resolve aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-13; national-defense-AF the order should identify the conviction, statutory match, threshold fact, and resulting immigration consequence.
Appeal Preservation: National Defense, Classified Information, Sabotage, and Treason Aggravated Felonies
national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records.
national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives.
national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard. national-defense-AF source review should confirm aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF current Supreme Court, BIA, statutory, and circuit authority should be checked before concession. national-defense-AF factual audit should revisit aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF assumptions about sentence or monetary amount should be replaced with reliable records. national-defense-AF divisibility review should examine aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF the record of conviction should be used only when the statute contains legally distinct alternatives. national-defense-AF burden review should address aggravated-felony-national-defense-treason-practice-14; national-defense-AF deportability must be established under the governing clear-and-convincing standard.
Primary Legal Authorities and Sources
- 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(43) — Aggravated Felony Definition Current House U.S. Code source for the aggravated-felony definition.
- 8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) — Aggravated-Felony Deportability Primary deportability statute for a person convicted of an aggravated felony after admission.
- EOIR BIA Precedent Chart — Aggravated Felonies Official EOIR topic chart collecting BIA aggravated-felony precedents.
- EOIR Precedent Decisions — Volume 22 Official EOIR source including Matter of Aldabesheh, Ruiz-Romero, and Alvarado-Alvino.
- EOIR Precedent Decisions — Volume 23 Official EOIR source including Matter of Martinez-Recinos.
- EOIR Precedent Decisions — Volume 26 Official EOIR source including Matter of Adeniye, Garza-Olivares, and Alvarado.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main rule for national defense treason aggravated felony immigration?
Does every conviction labeled this way qualify as national defense treason aggravated felony immigration?
Does sentence length matter for national defense treason aggravated felony immigration?
What conviction records matter for national defense treason aggravated felony immigration?
What immigration consequences follow from national defense treason aggravated felony immigration?
How should national defense treason aggravated felony immigration be preserved for appeal?
Related INA237.com Guides
Need Help With a Removal Case?
If you have an NTA, immigration court notice, USCIS denial, ICE document, or criminal record relevant to possible removability, keep a complete copy available for review.
Request a Consultation