INA §237(a)(4) Security, Terrorism, Foreign Policy, Atrocity, and Religious Freedom Grounds

INA §237(a)(4)(B) Terrorist Activities: Deportability Overview

INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). This page focuses on the charge, proof, incorporated definitions, relief consequences, and preservation.

Reviewed by Peter Messersmith September 18, 2026

Direct Answer

INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association.

Core Rule

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture core rule applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture core rule applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture core rule applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture core rule applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence.

Statutory Text

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture statutory text applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture statutory text applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture statutory text applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture statutory text applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date.

Elements

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture elements applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture elements applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture elements applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture elements applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately.

Charging Theory

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture charging theory applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture charging theory applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture charging theory applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture charging theory applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof.

Burden

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture burden applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture burden applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture burden applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture burden applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause.

Evidence

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture evidence applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture evidence applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture evidence applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture evidence applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence.

Respondent Position

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture respondent position applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture respondent position applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture respondent position applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture respondent position applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date.

DHS Position

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture dhs position applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture dhs position applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture dhs position applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture dhs position applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately.

Judge Findings

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture judge findings applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture judge findings applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture judge findings applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture judge findings applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof.

Conduct or Conviction

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture conduct or conviction applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture conduct or conviction applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture conduct or conviction applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture conduct or conviction applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause.

Actor Status

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture actor status applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture actor status applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture actor status applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture actor status applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence.

Asylum Effect

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture asylum effect applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture asylum effect applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture asylum effect applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture asylum effect applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date.

Withholding and CAT

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture withholding and cat applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture withholding and cat applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture withholding and cat applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture withholding and cat applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately.

Appeal Preservation

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture appeal preservation applies this rule: The charging analysis should identify the exact incorporated clause rather than cite §237(a)(4)(B) alone. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture appeal preservation applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture appeal preservation applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture appeal preservation applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof.

Checklist

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture checklist applies this rule: Relief bars should be analyzed separately even when the same conduct triggers deportability. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture checklist applies this rule: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F). incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state the alleged conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate suspicion from proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should test each element independently. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should cite the source evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should challenge unreliable attribution. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture checklist applies this rule: The deportability ground therefore incorporates detailed terrorism definitions found in the inadmissibility statute. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate group status from conduct. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify any knowledge finding. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should record the activity date. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should separate removability from relief. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a burden ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels.

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture checklist applies this rule: The incorporated provisions cover terrorist activity, organization status, representation, membership, support, solicitation, and association. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should preserve evidence objections. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify exemption authority separately. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should state remaining protection. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should obtain reviewable findings. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should avoid conclusory labels. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should compare charge and proof. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should document information sources. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should address contrary evidence. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should request a clause-specific ruling. incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should identify the incorporated clause.

Primary Legal Authorities and Sources

8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(4) — Security and Related Grounds Current INA §237(a)(4) security and related deportability grounds.
8 U.S.C. §1182(a)(3) — Security and Related Grounds Current terrorism, foreign-policy, and atrocity definitions incorporated into INA §237(a)(4).
Matter of S-K-, 23 I&N Dec. 936 (BIA 2006) BIA precedent on terrorist organizations, material support, intent, and intended use.
8 C.F.R. §1240.8 — Burdens in Removal Proceedings Current removal and relief burden regulation.
8 C.F.R. §1208.13 — Asylum Eligibility Current asylum regulation and security bars.
8 C.F.R. §1208.16 — Withholding and CAT Current withholding and CAT regulation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the rule for INA 237(a)(4)(B) terrorist activities deportability overview?

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture: INA §237(a)(4)(B) makes deportable a person described in INA §212(a)(3)(B) or §212(a)(3)(F).

Does INA 237(a)(4)(B) terrorist activities deportability overview require a conviction?

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture requires reading the exact clause. Several security grounds are conduct based.

What burden applies to INA 237(a)(4)(B) terrorist activities deportability overview?

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture remains within DHS's clear-and-convincing removability burden.

Can INA 237(a)(4)(B) terrorist activities deportability overview affect asylum?

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture can overlap with separate asylum and withholding bars.

What evidence matters for INA 237(a)(4)(B) terrorist activities deportability overview?

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture requires evidence tied to the specific statutory element and source.

How is INA 237(a)(4)(B) terrorist activities deportability overview preserved for appeal?

incorporated terrorism deportability architecture should produce findings on clause, burden, evidence, conduct, and relief effect.

Case Evaluation

Need Help With a Removal Case?

If you have an NTA, immigration court notice, USCIS denial, ICE document, or criminal record relevant to possible removability, keep a complete copy available for review.

Request a Consultation