INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar
Section 245(c)(2) can bar certain applicants who fail to maintain lawful status or violate status terms.
Section 245(c)(2) requires a status-history analysis. Lawful status differs from authorized stay. Every I-94 period should be charted.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar
Section 245(c)(2) can bar certain applicants who fail to maintain lawful status or violate status terms.
245c2-status analysis addresses 245(c)(2) unlawful status adjustment bar directly.
245c2-status preparation separates jurisdiction and eligibility.
245c2-status review also separates waiver discretion.
245c2-status findings preserve issues for appeal.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 1
Section 245(c)(2) requires a status-history analysis. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates.
245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings.
245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status authority includes USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 7, Part B.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 2
Lawful status differs from authorized stay. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts.
245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly.
245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status authority includes EOIR — Adjustment of Status.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 3
Every I-94 period should be charted. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately.
245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence.
245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status authority includes 8 U.S.C. §1361 — Burden of Proof.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 4
Status violations should be dated precisely. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits.
245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings.
245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status authority includes 8 C.F.R. §1245.10 — INA §245(i).
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 5
Immediate relatives receive specified exemptions. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence.
245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required.
245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status authority includes 8 C.F.R. §1245.2 — Adjustment Jurisdiction.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 6
Unauthorized employment can involve separate provisions. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations.
245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current.
245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status authority includes 8 U.S.C. §1255 — Adjustment of Status.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 7
Pending extensions can require separate analysis. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record.
245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented.
245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status authority includes USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 7, Part B.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 8
Section 245(i) can provide another route. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete.
245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records.
245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status authority includes EOIR — Adjustment of Status.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 9
The applicant bears proof of any exemption. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled.
245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections.
245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status authority includes 8 U.S.C. §1361 — Burden of Proof.
INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar: Issue 10
The decision should identify the exact bar applied. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status alternative eligibility paths deserve review.
245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status preparation should anticipate DHS objections. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status discretion should receive separate analysis. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions.
245c2-status rulings should identify credited evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status closing should request specific findings. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status family relationships need primary proof. 245c2-status authority includes 8 C.F.R. §1245.10 — INA §245(i).
Evidence Map: INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar
245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection.
245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record.
245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status testimony should address disputed facts. 245c2-status waivers require independent statutory findings. 245c2-status preservation should include every objection. 245c2-status appellate review needs a complete record. 245c2-status visa evidence should be current. 245c2-status review begins with current authority. 245c2-status practice applies specifically here. 245c2-status practice should remain issue-specific. 245c2-status practice should avoid generic conclusions. 245c2-status practice should preserve current law.
Merits Hearing Plan: INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar
245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled.
245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status proof should use primary records.
245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status records should explain missing evidence. 245c2-status documents should identify their source. 245c2-status immigration history should be reconciled. 245c2-status proof should use primary records. 245c2-status cross-examination should test factual assumptions. 245c2-status jurisdiction should be resolved before merits. 245c2-status practice applies specifically here. 245c2-status practice should remain issue-specific. 245c2-status practice should avoid generic conclusions. 245c2-status practice should preserve current law.
Closing Framework: INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar
245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions.
245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely.
245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status adverse facts should be addressed. 245c2-status chronology should use exact dates. 245c2-status exhibits should support specific propositions. 245c2-status inadmissibility should be screened completely. 245c2-status filings should use pinpoint citations. 245c2-status translations should be certified when required. 245c2-status practice applies specifically here. 245c2-status practice should remain issue-specific. 245c2-status practice should avoid generic conclusions. 245c2-status practice should preserve current law.
BIA Preservation: INA §245(c)(2) Unlawful Status Bar
245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent.
245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete.
245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status eligibility should be charted separately. 245c2-status burdens should be stated expressly. 245c2-status counsel should update controlling precedent. 245c2-status criminal records should be complete. 245c2-status favorable equities should be documented. 245c2-status briefing should separate legal questions. 245c2-status practice applies specifically here. 245c2-status practice should remain issue-specific. 245c2-status practice should avoid generic conclusions. 245c2-status practice should preserve current law.
Primary Legal Authorities and Sources
- 8 U.S.C. §1255 — Adjustment of Status Primary adjustment statute.
- USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 7, Part B Current USCIS section 245(a) guidance.
- EOIR — Adjustment of Status Current EOIR adjustment guidance.
- 8 U.S.C. §1361 — Burden of Proof Primary burden provision.
- 8 C.F.R. §1245.10 — INA §245(i) Current section 245(i) regulation.
- 8 C.F.R. §1245.2 — Adjustment Jurisdiction Current adjustment jurisdiction regulation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main rule for 245(c)(2) unlawful status adjustment bar?
What evidence matters for 245(c)(2) unlawful status adjustment bar?
Does jurisdiction matter for 245(c)(2) unlawful status adjustment bar?
Who has the burden for 245(c)(2) unlawful status adjustment bar?
Can a waiver matter for 245(c)(2) unlawful status adjustment bar?
How is 245(c)(2) unlawful status adjustment bar preserved for appeal?
Related INA237.com Guides
Need Help With a Removal Case?
If you have an NTA, immigration court notice, USCIS denial, ICE document, or criminal record relevant to possible removability, keep a complete copy available for review.
Request a Consultation