Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Stone treats reopening or reconsideration as separate from judicial review of the underlying final order.
A pending agency motion does not automatically extend the statutory petition deadline for the original order. Riley's nonjurisdictional holding does not make the 30-day rule optional. Separate petitions may be necessary to preserve review of separate agency orders.
Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Stone treats reopening or reconsideration as separate from judicial review of the underlying final order.
The Stone finality starts with the operative agency order; the Stone finality then fixes finality, venue, exhaustion, and the review provision.
A complete Stone finality file separates agency motions; the Stone finality also separates stay litigation, record questions, and merits briefing.
Threshold Rule: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
A pending agency motion does not automatically extend the statutory petition deadline for the original order. For federal Stone finality, explain threshold rule point 1; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, threshold rule point 2 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, threshold rule point 3 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates threshold rule point 4; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact.
A Stone finality filing documents threshold rule point 5; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests threshold rule point 6; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports threshold rule point 7; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve threshold rule point 8; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain threshold rule point 9; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested.
For Stone finality, threshold rule point 10 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, threshold rule point 11 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates threshold rule point 12; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents threshold rule point 13; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests threshold rule point 14; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion.
Finality and Posture: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Riley's nonjurisdictional holding does not make the 30-day rule optional. For Stone finality, finality and posture point 1 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, finality and posture point 2 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates finality and posture point 3; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents finality and posture point 4; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue.
With Stone finality, counsel tests finality and posture point 5; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports finality and posture point 6; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve finality and posture point 7; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain finality and posture point 8; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, finality and posture point 9 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard.
Under Stone finality, finality and posture point 10 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates finality and posture point 11; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents finality and posture point 12; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests finality and posture point 13; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports finality and posture point 14; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence.
Jurisdiction and Channeling: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Separate petitions may be necessary to preserve review of separate agency orders. Under Stone finality, jurisdiction and channeling point 1 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates jurisdiction and channeling point 2; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents jurisdiction and channeling point 3; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests jurisdiction and channeling point 4; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion.
The Stone finality record supports jurisdiction and channeling point 5; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve jurisdiction and channeling point 6; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain jurisdiction and channeling point 7; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, jurisdiction and channeling point 8 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, jurisdiction and channeling point 9 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy.
The Stone finality analysis separates jurisdiction and channeling point 10; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents jurisdiction and channeling point 11; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests jurisdiction and channeling point 12; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports jurisdiction and channeling point 13; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve jurisdiction and channeling point 14; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions.
Exhaustion and Preservation: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Original-order and motion-denial claims should be separately identified. The Stone finality analysis separates exhaustion and preservation point 1; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents exhaustion and preservation point 2; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests exhaustion and preservation point 3; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports exhaustion and preservation point 4; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence.
Before briefing Stone finality, resolve exhaustion and preservation point 5; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain exhaustion and preservation point 6; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, exhaustion and preservation point 7 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, exhaustion and preservation point 8 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates exhaustion and preservation point 9; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact.
A Stone finality filing documents exhaustion and preservation point 10; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests exhaustion and preservation point 11; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports exhaustion and preservation point 12; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve exhaustion and preservation point 13; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain exhaustion and preservation point 14; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested.
Administrative Record: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
All relevant deadlines should be calendared independently. A Stone finality filing documents administrative record point 1; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests administrative record point 2; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports administrative record point 3; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve administrative record point 4; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions.
For federal Stone finality, explain administrative record point 5; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, administrative record point 6 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, administrative record point 7 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates administrative record point 8; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents administrative record point 9; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue.
With Stone finality, counsel tests administrative record point 10; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports administrative record point 11; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve administrative record point 12; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain administrative record point 13; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, administrative record point 14 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard.
Standard of Review: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
A pending agency motion does not automatically extend the statutory petition deadline for the original order. With Stone finality, counsel tests standard of review point 1; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports standard of review point 2; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve standard of review point 3; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain standard of review point 4; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested.
For Stone finality, standard of review point 5 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, standard of review point 6 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates standard of review point 7; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents standard of review point 8; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests standard of review point 9; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion.
The Stone finality record supports standard of review point 10; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve standard of review point 11; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain standard of review point 12; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, standard of review point 13 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, standard of review point 14 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy.
Review Bars: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Riley's nonjurisdictional holding does not make the 30-day rule optional. The Stone finality record supports review bars point 1; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve review bars point 2; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain review bars point 3; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, review bars point 4 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard.
Under Stone finality, review bars point 5 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates review bars point 6; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents review bars point 7; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests review bars point 8; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports review bars point 9; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence.
Before briefing Stone finality, resolve review bars point 10; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain review bars point 11; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, review bars point 12 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, review bars point 13 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates review bars point 14; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact.
Legal Questions: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Separate petitions may be necessary to preserve review of separate agency orders. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve legal questions point 1; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain legal questions point 2; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, legal questions point 3 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, legal questions point 4 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy.
The Stone finality analysis separates legal questions point 5; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents legal questions point 6; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests legal questions point 7; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports legal questions point 8; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve legal questions point 9; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions.
For federal Stone finality, explain legal questions point 10; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, legal questions point 11 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, legal questions point 12 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates legal questions point 13; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents legal questions point 14; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue.
Factual Questions: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Original-order and motion-denial claims should be separately identified. For federal Stone finality, explain factual questions point 1; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, factual questions point 2 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, factual questions point 3 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates factual questions point 4; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact.
A Stone finality filing documents factual questions point 5; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests factual questions point 6; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports factual questions point 7; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve factual questions point 8; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain factual questions point 9; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested.
For Stone finality, factual questions point 10 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, factual questions point 11 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates factual questions point 12; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents factual questions point 13; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests factual questions point 14; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion.
Available Remedy: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
All relevant deadlines should be calendared independently. For Stone finality, available remedy point 1 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, available remedy point 2 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates available remedy point 3; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents available remedy point 4; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue.
With Stone finality, counsel tests available remedy point 5; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports available remedy point 6; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve available remedy point 7; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain available remedy point 8; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, available remedy point 9 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard.
Under Stone finality, available remedy point 10 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates available remedy point 11; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents available remedy point 12; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests available remedy point 13; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports available remedy point 14; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence.
Filing Strategy: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
A pending agency motion does not automatically extend the statutory petition deadline for the original order. Under Stone finality, filing strategy point 1 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates filing strategy point 2; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents filing strategy point 3; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests filing strategy point 4; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion.
The Stone finality record supports filing strategy point 5; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve filing strategy point 6; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain filing strategy point 7; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, filing strategy point 8 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, filing strategy point 9 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy.
The Stone finality analysis separates filing strategy point 10; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents filing strategy point 11; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests filing strategy point 12; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports filing strategy point 13; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve filing strategy point 14; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions.
Briefing Strategy: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Riley's nonjurisdictional holding does not make the 30-day rule optional. The Stone finality analysis separates briefing strategy point 1; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents briefing strategy point 2; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests briefing strategy point 3; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports briefing strategy point 4; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence.
Before briefing Stone finality, resolve briefing strategy point 5; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain briefing strategy point 6; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, briefing strategy point 7 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, briefing strategy point 8 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates briefing strategy point 9; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact.
A Stone finality filing documents briefing strategy point 10; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests briefing strategy point 11; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports briefing strategy point 12; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve briefing strategy point 13; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain briefing strategy point 14; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested.
Stay and Enforcement: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Separate petitions may be necessary to preserve review of separate agency orders. A Stone finality filing documents stay and enforcement point 1; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests stay and enforcement point 2; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports stay and enforcement point 3; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve stay and enforcement point 4; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions.
For federal Stone finality, explain stay and enforcement point 5; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, stay and enforcement point 6 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, stay and enforcement point 7 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates stay and enforcement point 8; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents stay and enforcement point 9; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue.
With Stone finality, counsel tests stay and enforcement point 10; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports stay and enforcement point 11; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve stay and enforcement point 12; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain stay and enforcement point 13; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, stay and enforcement point 14 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard.
Common Errors: Motion to Reopen Does Not Automatically Toll the Petition-for-Review Deadline
Original-order and motion-denial claims should be separately identified. With Stone finality, counsel tests common errors point 1; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion. The Stone finality record supports common errors point 2; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve common errors point 3; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain common errors point 4; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested.
For Stone finality, common errors point 5 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, common errors point 6 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy. The Stone finality analysis separates common errors point 7; Stone finality distinguishes law; Stone finality distinguishes fact. A Stone finality filing documents common errors point 8; Stone finality calendars deadlines; Stone finality confirms venue. With Stone finality, counsel tests common errors point 9; Stone finality checks reviewability; Stone finality addresses exhaustion.
The Stone finality record supports common errors point 10; Stone finality uses pinpoint cites; Stone finality avoids new evidence. Before briefing Stone finality, resolve common errors point 11; Stone finality identifies review bars; Stone finality invokes exceptions. For federal Stone finality, explain common errors point 12; Stone finality preserves the issue; Stone finality states relief requested. For Stone finality, common errors point 13 matters; Stone finality identifies the order; Stone finality states the standard. Under Stone finality, common errors point 14 must be preserved; Stone finality cites the record; Stone finality requests the remedy.
Primary Legal Authorities and Sources
- Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386 (1995) Motions to reopen/reconsider do not automatically suspend finality for judicial review.
- Riley v. Bondi, 606 U.S. ___ (2025) Finality and nonjurisdictional 30-day rule.
- 8 U.S.C. §1252 — Judicial Review of Orders of Removal Current judicial-review statute.
- Mata v. Lynch, 576 U.S. 143 (2015) Courts of appeals may review BIA denials of statutory motions to reopen.
- Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010) Judicial review of reopening decisions preserved where discretion arises by regulation.
- Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 598 U.S. 411 (2023) Exhaustion is a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main rule for Stone motion reopen petition review deadline?
Which court handles Stone motion reopen petition review deadline?
Can new evidence be added in a Stone motion reopen petition review deadline case?
Does filing automatically stay removal in a Stone motion reopen petition review deadline case?
How does exhaustion affect Stone motion reopen petition review deadline?
How should Stone motion reopen petition review deadline be preserved for review?
Related INA237.com Guides
Need Help With a Removal Case?
If you have an NTA, immigration court notice, USCIS denial, ICE document, or criminal record relevant to possible removability, keep a complete copy available for review.
Request a Consultation